Currently raising capital? Leverage this free master-class scale your network.
All of our lists of capital raising blogs. Search by country, city, or industry.


Unde quidem itaque et ea modi distinctio reprehenderit. Aut doloribus minima nam porro dicta voThis article explains why the real key to raising capital is not just having a great product, but designing a business that continually builds assets and generates recurring cash flow. It contrasts “poorly designed” businesses that rely on the founder’s labor and one off sales with “well designed” companies that own intellectual property, licenses, real estate, or other assets that earn money even when the founder is not working. Using examples from education, media, and real estate, the piece shows how sophisticated investors think in terms of asset bases, resilience and repeatable cash flows, not just top line growth. It closes with practical questions founders can use to redesign their companies to be more capital ready, aligning directly with Smart Capital Network’s philosophy that structure, not just story, determines whether investors want to fund a business.

This article uses the founding story of 26North, a next generation alternatives firm, to explain how the most sophisticated capital allocators are rethinking size, alignment and strategy in the alternative investment space. It shows why the founder left a mega platform to build a smaller, flatter, more agile firm where he is the largest investor in every strategy and the team is paid for returns, not scale. The firm’s focus on the middle market, integrated private equity, credit and insurance, and disciplined cash flow investing offers a playbook for how institutional capital is evolving. For founders and CEOs in the lower middle market, the piece translates these themes into a clear message. investable companies are those designed around durable cash flows, clean structures and alignment with long term capital, not just compelling narratives.

This article breaks down a practical three step framework for finding investors consistently. First, place yourself in environments where wealthy people already gather, through either working your way in or paying your way in. Second, use status alignment in your opening sentences so you are perceived as a peer in the deal ecosystem rather than a fan. Third, follow up by sending ongoing deal flow so that you become known as the person who brings opportunities, which sets up an easier, warmer path to present your own fund or project. The piece also highlights how going to events with a partner and quietly ensuring your underlying structure is fundable can dramatically increase your capital raising success.

This article breaks down the three principles founders must master to raise capital in 2025: understanding the capital stages, knowing exactly what investors need at each stage, and using strategic fundraising design to avoid unnecessary dilution. From the role of pedigree at pre-seed to the importance of traction, TAM, GTM execution, and repeatability across later rounds, founders learn how venture capital truly makes decisions. The article concludes with a subtle, practical call to action: assess your readiness with SCN’s free Fundability Test.

Most businesses shouldn’t raise venture capital, and most investors aren’t looking at them anyway. VC only fits companies that can realistically scale to massive outcomes. Bootstrapping fits everything else and often leads to more control, more freedom, and real wealth. At Smart Capital Network, we help founders understand which path truly fits their business so they can pursue growth with clarity instead of guessing.

A seasoned founder explains when it actually makes sense to raise money, comparing bootstrapping, VC, indie funding, and revenue-based financing—and how the right choice can save you years of trial and error.

Early-stage valuation isn’t about spreadsheets. Investors price startups mechanically based on ownership targets and expected returns. Traditional valuation models don’t influence pre-revenue pricing. The only factor that pushes valuation upward is investor competition. Founders should let the market set the valuation and rely on comparables when pressed.

How to Structure Investor Meetings That Actually Lead to Funding Most founders waste investor meetings on long product demos and origin stories. This article breaks down a simple three step framework to flip that dynamic: a three minute pitch built around pain, product, progress, and people, a “magic question” that turns the meeting into a tailored conversation, and a clear close that creates concrete next steps even when the answer is no.

Early-stage startup valuations are rarely driven by spreadsheets; they’re driven by risk, upside, and investor pattern recognition. This article breaks down formal methods like Berkus and scorecard valuation, then explains the real mechanics: angels rely on gut, comparables, and expected returns. Founders learn how traction, team, market size, and negotiation shape their valuation—and why chasing an inflated early number can hurt future rounds.